How technology (textting) has affected our language How it affects the Research Paper

How technology (textting) has affected our language How it affects the way we process information - Research Paper model28-29) describes how spoken language and written language have traditionally been seen as entirely different variations, separately with their own set of rules. He explains that speech is time-bound, dynamic and transient, and most often occurs in reckon to face situations where there is both the chance to use non-verbal means like facial expressions and gestures, and the opportunity for speakers to vary their output depending on reactions coming from the listener. Written language, on the other hand, is space-bound, static and permanent and it is more ball because the writer does not always the person or persons who will be reading it, and must cause more effort to clarify the context and anticipate what the reader might be thinking. This traditional raft of language sees spoken language as more suited to emotional expressions in a accessible context, and written language more suited to factual purposes such as recording information or learning about something.When we look at examples of spoken language it is clear that grammar rules are used slight rigorously, and there is more tolerance of errors, contractions, imperfect sentence structures, for example someone might say hark back itll work? and the answer might be No way The full written version of these sentences would be Do you think it will work? and No, there is no way that this could work or No, I can think of no way in which this would work The subject of the sentence is obvious in the spoken context, and the tone of voice conveys that there is a question and answer routine going on here, whereas in a written text these elements need to be made clear for the reader.An interesting cartoon by Barron (2000) looks at the way all language develops and changes as new technologies arrive, for example when manuscripts gave way to belief in fifteenth century England there was imm ediately a much greater volume of written material available, and also a need for standardization. (Barron, 2000, p.57)